I agree with you and the long-term view of lasting joy.
I just thought this quote seemed overly simplistic. That is, if it were not taken in context, it could be a dangerous philosophy. There are times when your morals will make you miserable. And feelings are rarely a legitimate measure of right vs. wrong.
The problem more often lies in my application of my morals than in the morals themselves.
i think you're right to take issue with the isolated statement. and, for what it's worth, i don't always agree with my own posts. sometimes i put them out there just because i think they're provocative or funny, or, as in this case, the speaker himself is compelling. but, as you are noting in your comments, the path of wisdom requires the making of many distinctions.
I think that if your morals are making you dreary, it's time to take a good hard look at just *why* you are doing what you are doing. Maybe you are feeling dreary because you keep doing the right thing and no one notices and this is getting really old, but by golly, I'm gonna take the higher path, etc., etc.
Moralism for the sake of being moral without any sort of contextual relationship with a Person is very, very dreary indeed.
I like words, images, graphic design, well-turned phrases, doodling, humor and profundity. These are found in every quarter and I'm always on the hunt. I was rescued (in November, 1974) from guilt and a stubborn irrational belief in an impersonal chance universe (with the accompanying hopelessness). I'm now convinced that nothing is more obvious or worthy of our attention than our Creator and the one true ancient path. Only Jesus has the words of everlasting life. Like John Newton "I once was lost but now am found, was blind but now I see."
5 comments:
I don't know... doing the right thing can often be rather dreary.
weeping may endure for a night, but joy cometh in the morning.
I agree with you and the long-term view of lasting joy.
I just thought this quote seemed overly simplistic. That is, if it were not taken in context, it could be a dangerous philosophy. There are times when your morals will make you miserable. And feelings are rarely a legitimate measure of right vs. wrong.
The problem more often lies in my application of my morals than in the morals themselves.
i think you're right to take issue with the isolated statement. and, for what it's worth, i don't always agree with my own posts. sometimes i put them out there just because i think they're provocative or funny, or, as in this case, the speaker himself is compelling. but, as you are noting in your comments, the path of wisdom requires the making of many distinctions.
thanks so much for taking the time.
I think that if your morals are making you dreary, it's time to take a good hard look at just *why* you are doing what you are doing. Maybe you are feeling dreary because you keep doing the right thing and no one notices and this is getting really old, but by golly, I'm gonna take the higher path, etc., etc.
Moralism for the sake of being moral without any sort of contextual relationship with a Person is very, very dreary indeed.
Post a Comment